Reinterpretasi Model Tyler dalam Evaluasi Pembelajaran Digital Perspektif Manajemen Pendidikan Islam

Authors

  • Andika Febriyanto Fakultas Tarbiyah Ilmu Keguruan, Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, Mahasiswa Magister Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta Author
  • Suwadi Fakultas Tarbiyah Ilmu Keguruan, Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, Guru Besar Evaluasi Pendidikan Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta Author
  • Sutrisno Fakultas Tarbiyah Ilmu Keguruan, Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, Guru Besar Ilmu Pendidikan Islam Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta Author

Keywords:

Model Tyler, evaluasi program, manajemen pendidikan Islam, transformasi pembelajaran, mutu pendidikan.

Abstract

Transformasi pembelajaran digital menuntut perubahan paradigma evaluasi pendidikan dari orientasi hasil akhir menuju evaluasi berbasis proses dan data. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis relevansi Model Tyler dalam evaluasi pembelajaran digital serta mereinterpretasikannya dalam perspektif Manajemen Pendidikan Islam. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus interpretatif di salah satu Madrasah Ibtidaiyah di Kabupaten Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Data diperoleh melalui wawancara semi-terstruktur, observasi, dan studi dokumentasi yang melibatkan kepala madrasah, wakil kepala bidang kurikulum, dan guru. Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan thematic analysis melalui tahapan transkripsi, open coding, kategorisasi tema, interpretasi, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa praktik evaluasi pembelajaran digital telah menerapkan prinsip dasar Model Tyler, terutama pada perumusan tujuan pembelajaran sebagai dasar pelaksanaan dan evaluasi program. Namun, evaluasi masih didominasi pengukuran hasil akademik dan belum memanfaatkan data aktivitas pembelajaran digital secara sistematis. Data Learning Management System (LMS), seperti partisipasi dan interaksi siswa, belum digunakan optimal dalam pengambilan keputusan evaluatif. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa Model Tyler masih relevan, tetapi memerlukan reinterpretasi yang adaptif terhadap teknologi, analisis data digital, dan integrasi nilai-nilai pendidikan Islam.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Assabane, I., & Saïd, M. (2020a). The contribution of business intelligence to risk management in exporting SMEs: A literature review Assabane Ibrahim, Mssassi Said. 10, 133–142.

Assabane, I., & Saïd, M. (2020b). The contribution of business intelligence to risk management in exporting SMEs: A literature review Assabane Ibrahim, Mssassi Said. 10, 133–142.

Campos Hernandez, M. (2026). (PDF) Learning Outcomes Evaluation Through Learning Analytics Systems in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251347374

Cruickshank, V. (2018). Considering Tyler’s Curriculum Model in Health and Physical Education. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1), 207. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v5i1.1443

Elmi Mahzum, M. I., Sofyan, H., Nasrudin, M. F., & Mailizar, M. (2024). The Impact of Learning Management Systems (LMS) Based on Learning Analytics on the Academic Performance of Syiah Kuala University Students. Asian Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.24815/ajse.v6i2.38747

Fidrmuc, J. (2000). Restructuring European union trade with central and eastern European countries. Atlantic Economic Journal, 28(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300533

Fikri, M. I. A., Fadhilah, F. F., Asmendri, A. A., & Sari, M. (2025). Prinsip Dan Fungsi Manajemen Pendidikan Dalam Perspektif Islam. Jurnal Media Ilmu, 4(2), 142–156. https://doi.org/10.31869/jmiu.v4i2.7393

Jones, K. M. L. (2019). Learning analytics and higher education: A proposed model for establishing informed consent mechanisms to promote student privacy and autonomy. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0155-0

Lai, J. W. M., De Nobile, J., Bower, M., & Breyer, Y. (2022). Comprehensive evaluation of the use of technology in education – validation with a cohort of global open online learners. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9877–9911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10986-w

Lee, S. young, Shin, J.-S., & Lee, S.-H. (2019). How to execute Context, Input, Process, and Product evaluation model in medical health education. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 16, 40. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.40

Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Rosda. https://openlibrary.telkomuniversity.ac.id/home/catalog/id/190949/slug/metodologi-penelitian-kualitatif.html

Mulyana, D. (2001). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif: Paradigma baru ilmu komunikasi dan ilmu sosial lainnya. https://opac-pustakalaya.usbypkp.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=6346&keywords=

Ningsih, S., Suhardi, M., Sari, I. N., Wulan, D. S., Fadillah, M., & Amalia, N. (2025). IMPLEMENTASI LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (LMS) DI LINGKUNGAN PENDIDIKAN TINGGI. EDUTECH : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Berbantuan Teknologi, 5(2), 422–432. https://doi.org/10.51878/edutech.v5i2.6370

Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2018). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (Seventh edition, global edition). Pearson.

Singun, A. Jr. (2025). Unveiling the barriers to digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Discover Education, 4(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00430-9

Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome-based education: Critical issues and answers. American Association of School Administrators.

Suban, A., & Ilham, I. (2022). Education Management: Implications of Information Technology Development on The Moral Formation of Adolescents. Al-Tanzim: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(3), 921–933. https://doi.org/10.33650/al-tanzim.v6i3.3267

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.

Supriadi, S., Pahrudin, A., Yuberti, Y., & Rinaldi, A. (2025). The Effectiveness of Learning Management Systems in Enhancing Student Learning Outcomes in Higher Education. Jurnal Ilmiah Iqra’, 19(1), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.30984/jii.v19i1.3505

Taylor, M. J., McNicholas, C., Nicolay, C., Darzi, A., Bell, D., & Reed, J. E. (2014). Systematic review of the application of the plan–do–study–act method to improve quality in healthcare. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23(4), 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001862

Timbi-Sisalima, C., Sánchez-Gordón, M., Hilera-Gonzalez, J. R., & Otón-Tortosa, S. (2022). Quality Assurance in E-Learning: A Proposal from Accessibility to Sustainability. Sustainability, 14(5), 3052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14053052

Tyler, R. W. (Ralph W. (with Internet Archive). (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago : University of Chicago Press. http://archive.org/details/basicprincipleso00tyle

Downloads

Published

2026-05-26

How to Cite

Reinterpretasi Model Tyler dalam Evaluasi Pembelajaran Digital Perspektif Manajemen Pendidikan Islam. (2026). RUMI: Rumah Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 1(3), 16-26. https://journal.lenteramulia.org/index.php/rumi/article/view/106