Tantangan dan Masalah Implementasi Putusan PTUN Oleh Badan dan Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara
Keywords:
PTUN decision, execution, official compliance, dwangsom, rule of lawAbstract
This article examines the challenges and legal problems in the implementation of State Administrative Court (PTUN) decisions by state administrative officials in Indonesia. Although normatively PTUN decisions with permanent legal force are binding and must be executed, in practice their implementation faces various structural, regulatory, and cultural obstacles. Using a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the study analyzes Article 116 of Law No. 5 of 1986 and its amendments, as well as relevant academic studies. The findings indicate that the main weaknesses lie in the ambiguity of execution norms, the absence of a dedicated executorial body, weak supervision of non-compliant officials, and the ineffectiveness of dwangsom and administrative sanction mechanisms. These conditions contradict the rule of law principle and undermine legal certainty for justice seekers. The article offers recommendations for normative and institutional reform to strengthen the enforceability of PTUN decisions within Indonesia's administrative law system.
Downloads
References
Dessler, G. (2017). Human Resource Management (15th ed.). Pearson Education. Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25 (Edisi 9). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing Management (15th ed.). Pearson Education. Lupiyoadi, R. (2019). Manajemen Pemasaran Jasa: Berbasis Kompetensi (Edisi 3). Salemba Empat. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346 Mondy, R. W., & Martocchio, J. J. (2016). Human Resource Management (14th ed.). Pearson Education. Morrison, S., & Asante, E. A. (2021). Students’ Perception of Campus Safety and Security at Accra Technical University, Ghana. The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies, 9(4), 201–215. Napitupulu, D., Rahim, R., Abdullah, D., Setiawan, M. I., Abdillah, L. A., Ahmar, A. S., Simarmata, J., Hidayat, H., Nurdiyanto, H., & Pranolo, A. (2018). Analysis of Student Satisfaction Toward Quality of Service Facility. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 954(1), 012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/954/1/012019 Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670504271156 Prasetyo, B., & Jannah, L. M. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif: Teori dan Aplikasi. Rajawali Pers. Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta. Sujarweni, V. W. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis & Ekonomi. Pustaka Baru Press.
Theresiawati, T., Rahim, R., & Purnama, B. E. (2020). Variables Affecting E-Learning Services Quality in Indonesian Higher Education: Students’ Perspectives. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 297–330. https://doi.org/10.28945/4609 Tjiptono, F. (2018). Strategi Pemasaran. Penerbit ANDI. Wibowo, W. (2016). Manajemen Kinerja. PT RajaGrafindo Persada. Wilkins, S., Butt, M. M., & Annabi, C. A. (2022). Servicescape in Transnational Higher Education: The Effects of Campus Design, Physical Environment and Facilities on Student Experience and Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing for https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2020.1793541 Higher Education, 32(1), 1–21. Zeithaml, V. A., Bitner, M. J., & Gremler, D. D. (2018). Services Marketing: Integrating Customer Focus Across the Firm (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Alif Marta Nurhadi , Garri Selastiani, Rafael Ahmad Eryasafli, Ulfi Dwiani, Taufiq Alamsyah (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
